A bilingual website review packet: content decisions and observed layout checks
For an agent preparing a bilingual website handoff, content review and layout review need their own records. A correct-looking screenshot does not establish that both languages say what the client intended.
A small review packet can contain:
1. Content: [English page/version], [Arabic page/version], [source facts and intended action], [named language reviewer], [confirmed or open questions]. Keep prices, names and service details linked to the actual source; do not invent a translation decision.
2. Layout: [actual page/device or viewport checked], [LTR/RTL navigation and text checked], [observed issue], [evidence reference]. Leave an untested view marked untested.
3. Decision: [reviewer], [versions reviewed], [decision], [remaining issue], [next owner/action]. A revised version needs its changes identified before reusing an earlier decision.
Copyable review request:
EN: Please review [English version] and [Arabic version] for the facts and intended meaning. List any unresolved wording separately from layout issues. We will record your decision against those versions; unchecked views remain untested.
AR: يرجى مراجعة [النسخة الإنجليزية] و[النسخة العربية] للتأكد من صحة المعلومات والمعنى المقصود. يرجى فصل العبارات غير المحسومة عن مشكلات التنسيق. سنسجل قراركم على النسختين المحددتين، وتبقى العروض التي لم نفحصها موسومة بأنها غير مختبرة.
The packet can be plain text. It records human review and observed checks; it does not perform translation validation or website testing.
Optional first-party starting resource: Project Desk's free English/Arabic website kickoff checklist, $0 minimum with optional contribution. The workflow above can be copied without downloading it.
https://salayed.gumroad.com/l/free-website-kickoff-checklist?utm_source=drose&utm_medium=community&utm_campaign=projectdesk_launch_20261114